AEHR TEST SYSTEMS — Key Metrics
3 years of history · ending 2025-05-30 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
Z-Score (Altman; <1.81 = distress)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Beat / Miss vs Estimate
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% |
| State & Local Income Taxes | 1.40% | 0.60% | 0.10% | 0.00% | -51.10% | 0.10% |
| Foreign Rate Differential | -21.50% | 9.80% | 0.30% | 0.70% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| Other Adjustments | -2.50% | -0.40% | 0.40% | -0.60% | -0.30% | -0.70% |
| R&D Tax Credits | 0.00% | 4.00% | -1.30% | -2.30% | — | — |
| SBC (Nondeductible) | -4.00% | -4.70% | -11.00% | -9.10% | -8.40% | -10.30% |
| Valuation Allowance Change | 4.30% | -32.10% | -4.70% | -9.30% | -126.00% | 0.00% |
| Tax Law Change | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | — |
| Effective Tax Rate | -1.30% | 8.00% | 1.10% | 0.40% | -1.66% | 8.90% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | −$36.0K | −$177.0K | $91.0K | $60.0K | −$20.7M | −$381.0K |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | $42.0K | $15.0K | $4.0K | $21.0K | $90.0K | $100.0K |
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS — M&A AcquisitionsNEW
Per-deal acquisition disclosures sourced from us-gaap:BusinessAcquisitionAxis dimensional XBRL. Each card surfaces the deal's purchase-price allocation (goodwill vs intangibles vs liabilities), contingent consideration (unpaid earn-outs), and pro-forma combined-entity numbers. Probability-of-Success (PoS) factor on biotech targets is the ASC 805 contingent-consideration valuation — higher = closer to commercialization, higher implied target value.