Alphabet Inc. — Key Metrics
3 years of history · ending 2025-12-31 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
Z-Score (Altman; <1.81 = distress)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Beat / Miss vs Estimate
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
Alphabet Inc. — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% |
| State & Local Income Taxes | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| Foreign Rate Differential | -0.30% | 0.20% | 3.00% | 0.30% | 0.50% | — |
| Other Adjustments | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.00% | -0.40% | 0.20% | — |
| R&D Tax Credits | 2.30% | 1.60% | 2.20% | 1.80% | 1.50% | 1.30% |
| FDII Deduction | — | 2.50% | 5.40% | 4.60% | 3.80% | 2.50% |
| SBC (Nondeductible) | 1.70% | 2.50% | -1.20% | 1.20% | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Valuation Allowance Change | 1.40% | 0.60% | 0.90% | 0.60% | 0.50% | 0.70% |
| Tax Law Change | — | — | — | -1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 16.20% | 16.20% | 15.90% | 13.90% | 16.40% | 16.80% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | $7.81B | $14.70B | $11.36B | $11.92B | $19.70B | $26.66B |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | $4.99B | $13.41B | $18.90B | $19.16B | $27.35B | $21.53B |
Alphabet Inc. — Litigation CasesNEW
Per-case litigation disclosures sourced from us-gaap:LossContingenciesByNatureOfContingencyAxis dimensional XBRL. Coverage is sparse — most filers aggregate at the parent level (JNJ talc, PFE opioid) — but high-value when per-case disclosure exists. Loss estimate is either a single point or a low/high range, depending on how the issuer values the contingency.
As of 2025-10-29
| Case | Estimated Loss | Damages Sought | Settlement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy Matters | — | — | $1.40B |