JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — Key Metrics
10 years of history · ending 2025-12-31 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
M-Score (Beneish; >-1.78 flags risk)
Z-Score (Altman; <1.81 = distress)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Beat / Miss vs Estimate
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% |
| State & Local Income Taxes | -0.40% | 1.50% | 7.10% | 2.20% | 1.80% | -7.50% |
| Foreign Rate Differential | 1.40% | 0.50% | 1.20% | — | — | — |
| Other Adjustments | 0.30% | 0.20% | 0.70% | — | — | — |
| SBC (Nondeductible) | 1.90% | -0.40% | 3.10% | — | — | — |
| Valuation Allowance Change | -15.00% | -3.40% | -12.90% | — | — | — |
| Tax Settlements (Domestic) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.50% | 13.00% | 59.60% | 71.50% | -9.80% | -31.20% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | $25.1M | $19.6M | $18.0M | $63.3M | $16.8M | $147.9M |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | $20.4M | $36.5M | $44.7M | $48.1M | $46.0M | $19.9M |
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — Litigation CasesNEW
Per-case litigation disclosures sourced from us-gaap:LossContingenciesByNatureOfContingencyAxis dimensional XBRL. Coverage is sparse — most filers aggregate at the parent level (JNJ talc, PFE opioid) — but high-value when per-case disclosure exists. Loss estimate is either a single point or a low/high range, depending on how the issuer values the contingency.
As of 2019-04-12
| Case | Estimated Loss | Damages Sought | Settlement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attorney Fees | — | $28M | — |
| Legal Cost | — | $2M | — |
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — RestructuringNEW
Per-category restructuring disclosures sourced from us-gaap:RestructuringCostAndReserveAxis dimensional XBRL. Negative charges indicate reversals of prior accruals (a sign the original estimate was too aggressive — flattering current-period earnings).
As of 2025-12-31
| Category | Class | P&L Charge | Cash Paid | Reserve Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Closing | Facility Closing | — | — | $2M |