PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION — Key Metrics
3 years of history · ending 2025-12-31 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Beat / Miss vs Estimate
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2015 | FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 35.00% | 35.00% | 35.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% |
| State & Local Income Taxes | — | — | — | 2.99% | 3.22% | 3.20% |
| Foreign Rate Differential | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Adjustments | — | — | — | -0.20% | -0.23% | 0.20% |
| SBC (Nondeductible) | — | — | — | 0.23% | — | — |
| Valuation Allowance Change | — | — | — | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Tax Law Change | — | — | — | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Effective Tax Rate | — | — | — | 12.91% | 15.01% | 14.45% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2015 | FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | $237.7M | $236.4M | $258.3M | $76.9M | $110.5M | $106.7M |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | $6.5M | $10.0M | $2.2M | $8.8M | $113.0M | $22.8M |
PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION — Litigation CasesNEW
Per-case litigation disclosures sourced from us-gaap:LossContingenciesByNatureOfContingencyAxis dimensional XBRL. Coverage is sparse — most filers aggregate at the parent level (JNJ talc, PFE opioid) — but high-value when per-case disclosure exists. Loss estimate is either a single point or a low/high range, depending on how the issuer values the contingency.
As of 2025-12-31
| Case | Estimated Loss | Damages Sought | Settlement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contaminated Groundwater Wells | — | — | $8M |