DOLLAR TREE, INC. — Key Metrics
3 years of history · ending 2026-01-31 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
Z-Score (Altman; <1.81 = distress)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
DOLLAR TREE, INC. — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% |
| State & Local Income Taxes | 3.20% | 3.70% | 3.60% | 3.40% | 3.30% | — |
| Foreign Rate Differential | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Adjustments | 0.20% | -0.60% | -0.80% | -0.40% | -0.10% | 0.20% |
| SBC (Nondeductible) | 0.20% | -0.50% | -0.60% | — | — | — |
| Nondeductible Expenses | 0.40% | 0.10% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 1.30% | 0.50% |
| Valuation Allowance Change | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.30% | — | — | — |
| Tax Law Change | 0.00% | -3.80% | 0.70% | 0.00% | — | — |
| Effective Tax Rate | 22.90% | 18.60% | 23.90% | 23.80% | 24.70% | 24.80% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | $397.9M | $304.3M | $471.6M | $396.1M | $341.1M | $404.2M |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | — | — | — | $270.2M | $174.6M | $141.2M |
DOLLAR TREE, INC. — Litigation CasesNEW
Per-case litigation disclosures sourced from us-gaap:LossContingenciesByNatureOfContingencyAxis dimensional XBRL. Coverage is sparse — most filers aggregate at the parent level (JNJ talc, PFE opioid) — but high-value when per-case disclosure exists. Loss estimate is either a single point or a low/high range, depending on how the issuer values the contingency.
As of 2026-01-31
| Case | Estimated Loss | Damages Sought | Settlement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfavorable Regulatory Action Antidumping Order Paper Plates | $119M | — | — |
| Unfavorable Regulatory Action Antidumping Order Aluminum Pans | $75M | — | — |