HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. — Key Metrics
3 years of history · ending 2025-12-31 · SEC EDGAR
Forensics
Three classic accounting-quality scores. F-Score (0-9, higher = better fundamentals); M-Score (>-1.78 flags possible manipulation); Z-Score (>2.99 = safe, <1.81 = distressed). Use together — single-score readings are noisy.
F-Score (Piotroski 0-9)
M-Score (Beneish; >-1.78 flags risk)
Z-Score (Altman; <1.81 = distress)
Per Share Metrics
Turnover & Efficiency Analysis (days)
Expense Ratios
Working Capital Analysis
Valuation Multiples
Cash-Flow Multiples
Enterprise Value Multiples
52-Week Range
Trailing Returns
ROIC vs WACC
Yields
Capital Deployment Yields
Liquidity & Leverage Ratios
Earnings Quality (OCF/NI · FCF/NI · Sloan Accruals)
Earnings Forecasts
Per-quarter consensus estimates + actuals + beat/miss surprise. Sourced from Finnhub (Wall Street consensus aggregation).
Source caveat: Finnhub free tier returns the consensus mean only — analyst high / low / dispersion + analyst counts require a paid plan. A "$5.00 consensus" line above could mean "20 analysts at exactly $5" (high conviction) or "10 at $5.50, 10 at $4.50" (split). Treat single-line consensus accordingly.
EPS — Consensus vs Actual
Revenue — Consensus vs Actual
Beat / Miss vs Estimate
Stock Price on Earnings Dates
HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. — Effective Tax Rate ReconciliationNEW
Bridges from the federal statutory rate (21% post-TCJA) to the effective tax rate via the issuer's tax-note reconciliation lines. Sourced from EffectiveIncomeTaxRateReconciliation* flat CompanyFacts concepts. Conditional lines (R&D credits, FDII, SBC, valuation allowance, etc.) only render when the issuer discloses them. Persistent divergence between accrual tax expense and cash taxes paid is a leading signal for deferred-tax buildup.
Effective Rate Trend
| Reconciliation Line | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Statutory Rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | — |
| State & Local Income Taxes | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Foreign Rate Differential | -3.27% | -14.60% | -24.00% | 21.20% | 9.70% | — |
| Other Adjustments | -59.30% | 0.40% | 0.10% | -6.50% | -0.90% | — |
| Nondeductible Expenses | 85.60% | -2.10% | -3.10% | 38.90% | 3.80% | — |
| Valuation Allowance Change | 78.90% | 8.00% | -10.80% | 84.80% | -6.40% | — |
| Tax Law Change | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Qualified Production Activities (Legacy DPAD) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Effective Tax Rate | -13.52% | 12.70% | -16.80% | 2.44% | 32.20% | 27.40% |
Cash vs Accrual
| Item | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Expense (Accrual) | −$18.7M | −$9.0M | $12.6M | $18.4M | $26.4M | $11.7M |
| Income Taxes Paid (Cash) | — | — | — | — | — | $29.2M |
HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. — M&A AcquisitionsNEW
Per-deal acquisition disclosures sourced from us-gaap:BusinessAcquisitionAxis dimensional XBRL. Each card surfaces the deal's purchase-price allocation (goodwill vs intangibles vs liabilities), contingent consideration (unpaid earn-outs), and pro-forma combined-entity numbers. Probability-of-Success (PoS) factor on biotech targets is the ASC 805 contingent-consideration valuation — higher = closer to commercialization, higher implied target value.